Socrates jokingly suggests that if he were to get what he deserves, he should be honored with a great meal for being of such service to the state.
Socrates insists that he makes no claim of being eloquent in his speech. He explains that he has no experience with the law courts and that he will instead speak in the manner to which he is accustomed: He explains that his behavior stems from a prophecy by the oracle at Delphi which claimed that he was the wisest of all men.
Socrates then proceeds to interrogate Meletus, the man primarily responsible for bringing Socrates before the jury. Most of them are not present, and thus he is unable to give them the opportunity to reply to what he has to say. And if guilty, what penalty should we impose.
In making his defense, Socrates did not attempt to prove that he was innocent of the charge of disbelief in Plato s apology summary and main characters Athenian gods. Socrates had accepted it as good fun and even appeared to be amused by it. For I say that there will be more accusers of you than there are now; accusers whom hitherto I have restrained; and as they are younger they will be more severe with you, and you will be more offended at them.
The penalty might be changed to the payment of a sum of money, banishment from the city for a period of time, or a number of other things, any one of which would be preferable to a death sentence.
Socrates is found guilty by a narrow margin and is asked to propose a penalty. Obviously, Meletus does not understand the nature of the charges he is making, nor is he able to see the logical consequences implied in the statements he has been making.
The first and older accusers were men who disliked Socrates even when he was younger, and he was guilty of their charges more by association than the facts.
Plot overview and analysis written by an experienced literary critic. When told that it might still be possible for him to save his life if he would agree to change his manner of living and stop talking to people about controversial issues, Socrates replies that death is not necessarily an evil thing.
The story of Chaerephon and his trip to the oracle is meant to show the jurors that he not only believes in the city's gods although there is some dispute that Socrates did not truly believebut also was commanded to lead the life of a philosopher and to accept the truth that he is the wisest man around.
The only kind of eloquence for which he has any use is that which sets forth the truth in language so plain that they can all understand. That Socrates was a law-abiding citizen and not an enemy of the state is indicated by his conduct throughout his entire life.
It is generally believed to be the most reliable record of the event that has been preserved. Not on the inconsistency of a god individual, but on the fact that the gods quarrel and disagree, at least from the stories that Euthyphro believes. There is no need to remember that these stories of gods and goddesses are doing violence to each other are the paradigmatic example of what should be censored by the authorities in the ideal city of the Republic Cdwhich allows even an allegorical interpretation of these stories fundamentals of Greek religion.
This is another blow to the traditional polytheistic religion. He is not a rhetorician, and they should be ashamed for suggesting that he would try to lead them astray by the force of his eloquence. He was quite willing to accept responsibility for it.
Is he guilty or not guilty.
For I say that there will be more accusers of you than there are now; accusers whom hitherto I have restrained; and as they are younger they will be more severe with you, and you will be more offended at them. Socrates tells them that he will indeed speak the truth, and he implores the judges not to be thinking of the manner of his speech but only of the justice of the cause for which he pleads.
In claiming that he is not a rhetorician, Socrates wants to make it clear that he does not employ speech for the purpose of swaying the feelings of his audience. It is clear that both questions should be considered together. How the juror-conscientious reader will he interpret the silence of Socrates on this central point about which we have an opinion.
Instead, he addressed himself to the larger implications involved in the so-called crimes of which he had been accused. SuperSummary, a modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, offers high-quality study guides that feature detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, quotes, and essay topics.
This one-page guide includes a plot summary and brief analysis of Apology by Plato. In Plato’s view, Socrates was a paragon of virtue. Perhaps the essence of his virtue can be summarized in a single word—integrity. Socrates’ dedication to the truth was so total and so unswerving that the very thought of compromising that truth was repugnant to him.
Plato and Socrates’ Apology (Summary) share. Plato and the death of Socrates. Socrates was a character so familiar to the community, and for so many years, we have to look any further. Imagine a juror reasonably conscientious, who has attended the conversations of Socrates, which has recognized the difference between Socrates and the.
Socrates - The protagonist of The Apology, as well as all of Plato's other dialogues. Socrates seems to be a very simple man, not having many material possessions and speaking in a plain, conversational manner.
However, this seeming plainness is all a part of the ironic characteristic of Socrates' method.
Socrates claims to be a law-abiding man, and in the case of Leon of Salamis from his past, he risked death by disobeying the authorities and siding with the law. This is an important story because it provides insight into the character of Socrates based on his actions.
Plato's Apology gives an account of Socrates' trial. Apology in this case refers to an explanation or defense. Socrates had lived the life of a philosopher, engaging those around him in dialogue.Plato s apology summary and main characters